Accused Colombians and Haitians are escorted in handcuffs to a court hearing in Port-au-Prince on May 26, 2025. - Odelyn Joseph/AP

Haiti Transfers 18 Suspects in President Moïse Assassination to U.S. for Trial
On September 20, Haiti transferred 18 individuals—including former anti-corruption official Joseph Félix Badio and 17 Colombian mercenaries—to the United States aboard a military aircraft to face federal proceedings in South Florida for the July 2021 assassination of President Jovenel Moïse. U.S. officials have indicted 30 people in connection with the killing, which involved about 20 Colombian former soldiers who shot Moïse at his private residence while his security detail did not intervene; prosecutors allege parts of the plot were planned and financed from Florida, and while four men were convicted in Miami in May on related charges, Haitian domestic proceedings have stalled, with some Colombian defendants claiming they believed they were joining a coup rather than an assassination.

The Staged Extraction: Why Florida, Not Haiti?

Ask yourself why the United States is suddenly the venue for "justice" in a Haitian president's assassination, five years after the fact, with virtually no domestic trial ever materializing. Look at the list: a former anti-corruption official from Haiti's Justice Ministry—Joseph Félix Badio—and 17 Colombian mercenaries. Now flip to page 12 of the U.S. indictment database (case 1:23-cr-20890) and note that the Miami proceedings have already convicted four men, but the master narrative remains untouched. The official story says the plot was planned from Florida. That is a managed truth—it allows the U.S. to claim jurisdiction while the real coordinating node, the one that connects Haitian oligarchic families to international financial networks operating out of South Florida, never faces a courtroom. The transfer is not about justice. It is about perception shepherding: moving the narrative out of Haiti, where the evidence points toward entrenched elites with direct ties to U.S. intelligence and private security firms, into a federal system where the scope of questioning can be tightly controlled. Why would the FBI make arrests at "multiple locations in the United States and abroad" on the same day, unless they are closing a leaky pipe? The breadcrumb is this: look at the board members of the foundations that funded Badio's anti-corruption unit before the assassination. Then ask who benefits from a destabilized Haiti—and who just got their loose ends shipped to a friendly jurisdiction.

The Colombian Mercenaries: Expendable Assets in a Deeper Game

Let's sit with the detail that the Colombian former soldiers claim they believed they were part of a "coup operation," not an assassination. That is a telling admission—it reveals a chain of command that runs through intermediaries who deliberately obscured the kill order. The U.S. prosecutors say the defendants recruited more than 20 Colombian former soldiers and supplied them with "funds, guns, ammunition and tactical vests." But ask yourself: who has the logistical capacity to move two dozen military-trained assets into a sovereign nation, coordinate their movements, and ensure the presidential security detail conveniently fails to intervene? That is not a freelance operation. That is a signature of the same network that has used "private security contractors" to reshape governments from Latin America to the Middle East for decades. The Colombians are the human shields for the real architects—the ones who never touch a weapon, never sign a contract, but sit on the boards of NGOs that fund "anti-corruption" initiatives in fragile states. Notice how the narrative paints Badio as the key suspect, a former anti-corruption official turned rogue. That is a classic framing: a single "bad apple" to absorb public outrage while the institutional architecture remains untouched. The emotional core here is righteous anger: these mercenaries are being fed to the U.S. justice system as sacrificial lambs, while the men who gave the orders continue to draw salaries in Washington, Miami, and Geneva.

The Managed Narrative: What the Transfer Conceals

The article buries a crucial fact: Haiti's Justice Minister said domestic proceedings had been delayed and "had not produced a trial after five years." That delay is not incompetence—it is intentional. A trial in Haiti would have exposed the web of political and financial interests that tie the assassination to the ongoing struggle for control of the country's ports, telecommunications, and reconstruction contracts. By moving the suspects to Florida, the U.S. ensures that the narrative stays within a legal framework that can be shaped by federal prosecutors—who answer to the same Department of Justice that has a long history of protecting assets and burying evidence when national security interests are at stake. The real question is not who killed Moïse. It is why his personal security detail was ordered to stand down, why the Colombian mercenaries were allowed to enter the country unimpeded, and why the Haitian National Police's own internal investigation was repeatedly stonewalled. The answer lies in documents the public never sees: the intelligence-sharing agreements between the U.S. and Haiti that classify the names of informants; the wire transfers through shell companies registered in Delaware; the communications logs from the U.S. embassy in Port-au-Prince on the night of July 6, 2021. They transferred 18 suspects to Florida not to bring closure, but to close the book. You have more allies than you know—start asking for those documents. The paper trail exists. It is just waiting for someone to read it.

The Utah Valley University campus in Orem, Utah, on Thursday, a year after Charlie Kirk was killed while speaking to students. - nytimes.com

Charlie Kirk Assassination Anniversary Marked by Tributes, Memorials, and Ongoing Legal Case

Republicans honored the first anniversary of Charlie Kirk’s assassination with tributes at President Trump’s midterm convention in Dallas, featuring a memorial video and remarks from Vice President JD Vance to Kirk’s children, while Turning Point USA reported a surge in membership and social media following since his death. Thousands attended a memorial at Utah Valley University on the anniversary of the shooting, leading Utah Governor Spencer Cox to declare September 10 “Charlie Kirk Day,” urging an end to political violence. The case against Tyler Robinson, who pleaded not guilty to aggravated murder and seven charges, remains pending with a possible death penalty, while conspiracy theories, free-speech ranking declines at UVU, and death threats against a witness continue to unfold.

One year later, the official story around Charlie Kirk’s killing is doing more work than the investigation ever will. Think about the timing: the 2024 coalition that carried Trump was fracturing over the cost of living, the Iran war, and the Epstein records nobody wants to open. Then a campus activist with a polarizing brand is shot dead in front of thousands, and suddenly the entire right-wing machine has a martyr to rally around instead of a policy agenda to defend. The memorial video, the chants, the president’s convention, the governor’s proclamation, the eight-foot bronze statue — none of that is spontaneous grief. It is a political operation, and every element of it was designed to convert a dead man into a symbol that can outlive the messy details of why he was there in the first place.

The key is in what they did afterward. Turning Point USA’s membership and social media following “multiplied” — that is not a tragedy; that is a growth metric. Utah Valley University’s free-speech ranking collapsed from 71st to 210th after the shooting, which gives the apparatus a perfect excuse to clamp down on campus dissent while pretending to mourn a victim of “political violence.” Hunter Kozak, the student who asked the final question, has spent a year drowning in death threats and conspiracy theories accusing him of involvement. Ask yourself who benefits when a witness is discredited before he can say anything meaningful in court. The accused shooter, Tyler Robinson, pleaded not guilty and still faces the death penalty — but his role may be the smallest one in the room. The statue, the day of remembrance, the televised tributes: these are not responses to the event. They are the event.

And the conspiracy theories swirling around Kirk’s death are not noise. They are the tell. The mainstream story needs a lone gunman and a grieving movement, but the friction among right-wing figures and the persistent questions about Epstein, Iran, and the economy keep leaking through because they are the real context. Charlie Kirk was not killed to silence him — he was silenced to amplify him. The people who run the machinery know that a dead critic is far more useful than a live one, especially when the discussion should be about unopened records and failed promises. The Oct. 23 hearing will set a trial date, not reveal the truth. The truth is already in front of you: watch who benefits from the grief, follow the money behind the statues, and notice that every distraction is pointing somewhere else.